Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby durhamshrimp » Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:51 pm

Abbo wrote:And whats wrong with hanging paedophiles ??


Should we hang them in public?
durhamshrimp
 

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby outsider » Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:58 pm

between the balls on the lotto, that would get viewing figures up
All posts posted under "Outsider" are my own personal views.

DILLIGAF


Viva la Revolution


The voices in my head may not be real, but they have some good ideas!
User avatar
outsider
 
Posts: 5064
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 9:23 pm

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby George Dawes » Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:06 pm

Keith wrote:
Abbo wrote:Paedophiles are the scum of the earth, hang them !!! and anyone that disagrees are as bad as them.


Oh dear. You probably agreed with George Bush when he suggested that 'if you aren't with us, you're a terrorist'?

One victim of sexual abuse that I clearly remember working with (I'm a Registered Mental Nurse) was a young teenager. She had disclosed abuse and her father ended up in prison. Abuse has a strange knock on effect that unless you have experience of it, can appear to defy logic. In this instance, the mother denied it had ever happened. She couldn't face the fact that her husband had had sex with her daughter. The impact upon her own sexuality, the impact of someone she loved doing 'that' was beyond her ability to accept. So she denied it entirely and accused her 'evil bitch' of a daughter of 'making it up'. Her siblings obviously agreed with their mother, why wouldn't they? Their mother & father both denied it, it couldn't be true. They lost their father to prison and with no main 'bread winner', they lost the house and ended up in a council house.

This poor kid has not only faced being raped, she's now ostracised within her own family. While she was on the psychiatric unit she actually said that she wished she'd never disclosed the abuse... it was easier to be raped than go through what she was going through afterwards. I'm not sure it helped or not when her sister later disclosed that she'd been raped too.

Now would this girl have been more or less likely to disclose abuse if she knew her father was going to die? I'm pretty sure that she would have been even more likely to suffer in silence. The vast majority of abusers are known to the family. In a massive amount of cases the relationship between the abusers and the victim of the abuse is otherwise positive... "this is our secret, if you tell anyone daddy will die"... will that keep the secrets for longer?

If you've had young people or adults disclose sexual abuse to you, you will have realised that this isn't a subject that has easy answers. The fact that the fascist party think that there are easy, 'populist' answers suggest that they haven't got the slightest clue what the real questions are.



so your idea is just send them to prison for a couple of years, brilliant deterrent..
George Dawes
 
Posts: 8487
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:31 am

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby Keith » Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:34 pm

DawZi wrote:
Keith wrote:
Abbo wrote:Paedophiles are the scum of the earth, hang them !!! and anyone that disagrees are as bad as them.


Oh dear. You probably agreed with George Bush when he suggested that 'if you aren't with us, you're a terrorist'?

One victim of sexual abuse that I clearly remember working with (I'm a Registered Mental Nurse) was a young teenager. She had disclosed abuse and her father ended up in prison. Abuse has a strange knock on effect that unless you have experience of it, can appear to defy logic. In this instance, the mother denied it had ever happened. She couldn't face the fact that her husband had had sex with her daughter. The impact upon her own sexuality, the impact of someone she loved doing 'that' was beyond her ability to accept. So she denied it entirely and accused her 'evil bitch' of a daughter of 'making it up'. Her siblings obviously agreed with their mother, why wouldn't they? Their mother & father both denied it, it couldn't be true. They lost their father to prison and with no main 'bread winner', they lost the house and ended up in a council house.

This poor kid has not only faced being raped, she's now ostracised within her own family. While she was on the psychiatric unit she actually said that she wished she'd never disclosed the abuse... it was easier to be raped than go through what she was going through afterwards. I'm not sure it helped or not when her sister later disclosed that she'd been raped too.

Now would this girl have been more or less likely to disclose abuse if she knew her father was going to die? I'm pretty sure that she would have been even more likely to suffer in silence. The vast majority of abusers are known to the family. In a massive amount of cases the relationship between the abusers and the victim of the abuse is otherwise positive... "this is our secret, if you tell anyone daddy will die"... will that keep the secrets for longer?

If you've had young people or adults disclose sexual abuse to you, you will have realised that this isn't a subject that has easy answers. The fact that the fascist party think that there are easy, 'populist' answers suggest that they haven't got the slightest clue what the real questions are.



so your idea is just send them to prison for a couple of years, brilliant deterrent..


...and I said that where?
“Britain faces a simple and inescapable choice - stability and strong Government with me, or chaos with Ed Miliband: ".

David Cameron. May 4th 2015.
So how did that work out then?
User avatar
Keith
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22427
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 3:39 pm
Location: Isle of Man

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby Abbo » Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:45 pm

Outsider and Durhamshrimp you should be ashamed of yourselfs !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Abbo
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:02 am

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby George Dawes » Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:47 pm

...and I said that where?




OK then you not for hanging them, and i don't think sending them to prison for 2yrs after raping a child is right.



shall we agree to castrate them? like none liberal people would have done ?
George Dawes
 
Posts: 8487
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:31 am

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby Abbo » Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:54 pm

Go easy there DawZi it appears we have some people that may not agree with our opinions, dont be upsetting them now
Abbo
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:02 am

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby Keith » Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:27 pm

DawZi wrote:
...and I said that where?


OK then you not for hanging them, and i don't think sending them to prison for 2yrs after raping a child is right.

shall we agree to castrate them? like none liberal people would have done ?


We're getting closer :o I actually don't have any moral objection to chemical castration and I certainly believe it should be available. In certain situations it would be a much more useful option than prison.
“Britain faces a simple and inescapable choice - stability and strong Government with me, or chaos with Ed Miliband: ".

David Cameron. May 4th 2015.
So how did that work out then?
User avatar
Keith
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22427
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 3:39 pm
Location: Isle of Man

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby Posh » Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:41 pm

Abbo wrote:Paedophiles are the scum of the earth, hang them !!! and anyone that disagrees are as bad as them.


Yes, hang them all.
Yes, hang everyone who disagrees with hanging them.
And then hang everyone who disagrees with hanging people who disagree with hanging them.
And then when we're done we'll hang all the murderers.
And then we'll hang children and the mentally ill who commit the acts above.
If they're innocent, well the dead don't cry do they?

Oh, and we'll call ourselves the Taleban.
VIVE LA REVOLUTION!
User avatar
Posh
 
Posts: 4326
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:57 pm
Location: Everywhere and nowhere baby

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby marky » Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:49 pm

Abbo wrote:Paedophiles are the scum of the earth, hang them !!! and anyone that disagrees are as bad as them.

Wow. I've never been told I'm as bad as a paedophile before! Punishing people through legal killing is no better than the original act of crime. By the way, anyone who resorts to abusing other people to try and make a point instantly loses the argument. I seem to recall you were rather forceful in your condemnation of a recently banned poster. You've proved yourself to be no better.

Abbo wrote:Go easy there DawZi it appears we have some people that may not agree with our opinions, dont be upsetting them now

Funnily enough, your opinion is just what the word opinion suggests. An opinion. A belief that can be argued against. I'm starting to get the impression your beliefs come from the "I'm right and anyone who disagrees is scum" department. Perfect Nazi credentials :roll:

To get back on topic, I'm glad Keith posted the National Socialist agenda from 1920 because people either choose to forget or just don't know that the Nazis were more than just a war mongering and mass murdering party. If you study their domestic programme in the 30s, it was extremely protectionist and highly nationalised in style. The Nazis were economically left-wing. People now remember them for the Holocaust, WWII and the Gestapo (and all the far-right connotations). But there is a remarkable comparison between the stated policies of the National Socialist German Workers Party and the BNP. One that I wish more were aware of.
Some are dead and some are living. In my life, I've loved them all.
marky
 
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby durhamshrimp » Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:34 pm

Abbo wrote:Outsider and Durhamshrimp you should be ashamed of yourselfs !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Ashamed of what? You could go to Iran mate, I think you'd fit in better there.
durhamshrimp
 

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby George Dawes » Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:37 am

good topic though, best one ive seen on here so far
George Dawes
 
Posts: 8487
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:31 am

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby Keith » Tue Jun 30, 2009 6:56 am

DawZi wrote:good topic though, best one ive seen on here so far


but one that will not go much further if people resort to abusing other posters (it wasn't DawZi by the way!) Please keep it above personal abuse.
“Britain faces a simple and inescapable choice - stability and strong Government with me, or chaos with Ed Miliband: ".

David Cameron. May 4th 2015.
So how did that work out then?
User avatar
Keith
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22427
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 3:39 pm
Location: Isle of Man

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby North Stand Shrimp » Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:15 am

Abbo wrote:And whats wrong with hanging paedophiles ??


What if someone was found guilty but was actually innocent?
Miscarriages of justice happen all the time.
User avatar
North Stand Shrimp
 
Posts: 536
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 11:29 am
Location: On the run

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby wijit » Tue Jun 30, 2009 10:38 am

DawZi wrote:in fairness after reading the above, the only thing in common is there both and obviously right-wing, there's still no argument or "PROOF" that the BNP would go to the extreme in this day and age like the Nazi party by ethnic cleansing and invade Europe

Well, yes there is. they want to remove all non-whites from this country, regardless of where they were born. that is a form of ethnic cleansing.
Abbo, I think it was you who aksked whats wrong with hanging paedophiles, what happens when you get the wrong person? remember, at the time we have proved many people guilty only for technology and new evidence to prove we were wrong.
wijit
 
Posts: 399
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:21 pm

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby Aspers » Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:20 am

It has to be proved 100%, not beyond reasonable Doubt but 100%.

Then put the paedo's to sleep, we don't need or want them.
We don't need to hang them or punish them just kill them quickly and quietly.
Aspers
 
Posts: 2354
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 7:25 am

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby outsider » Tue Jun 30, 2009 3:27 pm

Aspers wrote:It has to be proved 100%, not beyond reasonable Doubt but 100%.

Then put the paedo's to sleep, we don't need or want them.
We don't need to hang them or punish them just kill them quickly and quietly.



i agree with most of that apart from the "quickly and quietly", if " It has been proved 100%, not beyond reasonable Doubt but 100%." It should be slowly and very very painfully IMO as a Dad
All posts posted under "Outsider" are my own personal views.

DILLIGAF


Viva la Revolution


The voices in my head may not be real, but they have some good ideas!
User avatar
outsider
 
Posts: 5064
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 9:23 pm

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby Trevor » Tue Jun 30, 2009 3:44 pm

outsider wrote:
Aspers wrote:It has to be proved 100%, not beyond reasonable Doubt but 100%.
if " It has been proved 100%, not beyond reasonable Doubt but 100%."


And how does that work, then? Just talk us through it.
Trevor
 
Posts: 217
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:57 pm

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby Abbo » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:31 pm

Well what can i say, i wonder if any of the do-gooders who disagree with my views would change there minds if something ever happened to there kids. Dont think they would have the same view then !!!!
Abbo
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:02 am

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby marky » Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:46 pm

I'm sorry, Abbo, but someone could rape me and I still wouldn't want them to be killed by the state. Besides, it's not for the victim to choose what happens to the perpetrator. They are never the best judge of suitable punishment. Also, why is it that someone with socially liberal views (in the modern sense) are always labelled as 'do gooders' by those of a right-wing persuasion?

By the way, I don't want to take this discussion too off topic, but I'd be interested the hear your views of Euthanasia. I know a few people who support the death penalty but are against ending a life to prevent an innocent person suffering. The two don't really add up...
Some are dead and some are living. In my life, I've loved them all.
marky
 
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby George Dawes » Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:29 pm

why is it that someone with socially liberal views (in the modern sense) are always labelled as 'do gooders' by those of a right-wing persuasion?




and why is it if somebody who as a opinion untowards the immigration problem in the UK or finds Bernard Manning jokes funny and supports England is made to feel ashamed to wear England colours with pride whether it be football rugby or cricket


extremist left-wingers will have people think that the above are just morons & racist :?:
Last edited by George Dawes on Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
George Dawes
 
Posts: 8487
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:31 am

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby marky » Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:04 pm

DawZi wrote:and why is it if somebody who as a opinion untowards the immigration problem in the UK or finds Bernard Manning jokes funny and supports England is made to feel ashamed to wear England colours with pride whether it be football rugby or cricket

1) I would suggest most people have an opinion on immigration one way or another.
2) Bernard Manning jokes belong in a different era, along with the sentiment.
3) I support our national cricket team and I don't fell ashamed about that. It's how people sometimes support the national teams that can leave a lot to be desired...

DawZi wrote:extremist left-wingers will have people think that the above are just morons & racist

Translation?
Some are dead and some are living. In my life, I've loved them all.
marky
 
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby Abbo » Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:43 pm

DawZi,
your wasting your time mate.
Abbo
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:02 am

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby marky » Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:45 pm

extremist left-wingers will have people think that the above are just morons & racist

I don't think I'd agree with that. If you look at the history of the extreme left in terms of actual political power, they've hardly been bastions of freedom and tolerance! The USSR was as abhorrent as the Third Reich in Germany. North Korea isn't exactly welcoming of freedoms for citizens. China has a one party state and an iron grip on political activity, even now with their amalgamation of capitalism and communism.

It's people who class themselves as being either side of centre who often fall into the 'morons and racist' trap. However, I don't think there can really be any argument against the claim the BNP are a racist party. Any party that uses skin colour as a prerequisite of membership cannot be described as anything else.
Some are dead and some are living. In my life, I've loved them all.
marky
 
Posts: 2088
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Re: Stop[ The BNP Public Meeting Lancaster Town Hall 14th July

Postby Trevor » Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:52 pm

Abbo - Wot? Trying to browbeat others into agreeing with him by implying anyone who diasgrees is a dogooder?

If hes got a point let him argue it. If he can't then maybe his points not sound enough.

I'm still waiting for an explanation of how you make sure someone's 100% guilty so you can kill them.
Trevor
 
Posts: 217
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:57 pm

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Keith and 85 guests