Freez wrote:We didn't play as well as we could have. They played pretty well, end result about right.
The main difference between the Preston/Wolves games and last night was simple.
We started all three games with a withdrawn formation with a lone striker which sets out to deny the opposition space in our half and frustrate them.
Firstly, Forest did not underestimate us, their attitude and application from the first whistle was spot on, they wanted to perform, their movement off the ball was superb. We had five in midfield and still were chasing shadows, valiant though our players were.
Secondly, the early goal encouraged them and we spent the entire first half hurriedly clearing our lines and limiting the damage, remarkable that it was only one at half time.
Thirdly, we set up this way last season with Thommo, Twiss and Baker withdrawn, ready to break when we got a few scraps of posession. Last night, Howe caused them a few problems, but was isolated barring a couple of incidents. Hunter and Carr did make runs but we didn't have the attacking force of the named three to worry defences. Wainwright was superb last night, covering in front and behind Parrish, he was never a force going forward however, but was subbed as he was exhausted.
IMO we have to accept that we are probably going to be harder to beat at our league two level week in and week out but that in our current guise we lack the explosive potential to worry teams from a higher grade of football similar to last season.
From a league point of view this is good, but last night we set up to not get hammered and played right into a good sides hands. They ran us ragged.
I feel we may have been better setting up with two up front and four in midfield and not conceding as much ground and posession around half way, particularly after the first goal went in so early. We would still get hammered most days, but at least they would have had to work a lot harder to do it.
TBF we did come out and have a good go for the first fifteen minutes of the second half, and had we concocted an equaliser it might have been interesting, but at least we had a go.
However, this is not a criticism, just an opinion, and I still have faith and can see what Sam n Lills are trying to achieve.
Lets hope Rotherham is a good game.
Up the Shrimps.
Christies Child wrote:..or defend if a full back suddenly decides to go walk about near the touch flag in an opponents half with 2 minutes to go!
mfcbro wrote:Come on c.c. how can you critise or pass a comment when you wernt there relying on highlights.
Jody wrote: lets concentrate on the League for now.
Jody wrote:How we all see games differently. I think Parrish was very good again last night, but thought Wainwright appeared a little out of his depth last night.
Was quite surprisd when we started with 5 across midfield, and 1 up front, thought we'd have gone 442 and had a bit more of a go at them from the off. Credit to them, Forest were very good last night, at times their movement was awesome and they passed us off the park. And that was without 4 or 5 of their key players out through injury. I think Seage said last night on the way home that they spent £4m on players in close season, did we even spend £4??
Occasionally there are shocks in cup games, and we had our fair share last season. But they are in the Championship, and we are League Two, and last night the gulf in class showed at times. But credit to our lads, they all battled hard and never gave up even though they were chasing shadows for a lot of the game. All in all, a very nice ground, a nice night out, and a reality check for our lads - feet back on the ground, lets concentrate on the League for now.
mfcbro wrote:Thought Parrish struggled last night forcing wainwright to defend for most of the game,which he did very well.Come on c.c. how can you critise or pass a comment when you wernt there relying on highlights.Forest had pace all over the pitch and were just too good for us.
Christies Child wrote:mfcbro wrote:Thought Parrish struggled last night forcing wainwright to defend for most of the game,which he did very well.Come on c.c. how can you critise or pass a comment when you wernt there relying on highlights.Forest had pace all over the pitch and were just too good for us.
The highlights showed up our defensive short comings for all to see....and it wasn't just last night.....
I'm sure that other managers have taken note.
No doubt some think that our defence is OK. Unfortunately I'm not one of them and I doubt if I'm alone in that view.
What's even more important though is that our superb management team recognise the problem and rectify ASAP.
Bryan wrote:Agree with all of that, Freez. Sammy's obviously looking at a different way of playing this season. Also i would like to add that with so many new faces it will take time to gel etc. Forest were quality and sometimes you have to bow down to it. Calderwood deserves praise for taking the tie seriously and we should also be flattered by that.
So not at our best at Forest but all credit to them for in truth they outclassed us.
St Albans Shrimp wrote:Agree with your comments Freez.
We didnt have a "out" ball - Howe didnt offer too much - it is early days and he still (like many others) needs to know how the other players play.Several times last night when we had the ball in defence he didnt make himself available or made the wrong decision of where to run.As for Parrish I felt he didnt have a good game - agreed we were playing at a higher level however he struggled and Wainwright was clearly having to defend too much. With Curtis doing the same on the left our attacking options were limited.Maybe this was our game plan however on several occasions when we had the ball at the back Wainwright came back rather than pushing on down the wing.
Saying all this if one of the three chances had gone in shortly after half time it could have been interesting.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 166 guests